Professional SEO Services | Freelance | Graphic Design Jobs | + del.icio.us |

Need a Graphic Designer?

Free Graphic Design Bids from DesignQuote.net
Service: Location:

Budget: Deadline:

How Many Quotes:

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Creative Commons Has updated their license

CC Creative Commons Attribution is in version 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
 

You are free:

  • to Remix — to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

  • Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

 

Useful Design has added some free CSS templates to their background and wallpaper library

http://www.usefuldesign.org/

http://www.usefuldesign.org/templates/clay/

http://www.usefuldesign.org/templates/lush/

http://www.usefuldesign.org/templates/water/

All the templates are valid XHTML and CSS 2.1 and licensed under CC Attribution.

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

The Super Bowl Ad That Almost Was...

Posted by great scott!

With the Super Bowl fast approaching, Rand looks back on his legendary proposal shenanigans of last year. Finally, all the details of the saga are revealed. Watch, comment and enjoy.  If you'd like to see the original proposal reaction video, go check it out.





UPDATE: I thought I'd add in a few more details about this post, since it's a bit personal. You can obviously see in the video that I'm a bit uncomfortable and nervous talking about it, even to this day, and I think a lot of that has to do with those old feelings from last year popping up. Hiding something from a spouse or partner, especially something this big, is hard, and it made for one of the most stressful times in my life. I honestly think it was worth it, though - just watching Mystery Guest putting the ring on her finger again makes it all worthwhile, and having a great story to tell about our engagement is a lot of fun (although, admittedly, I don't talk about it very much).

As far as the sponsor goes, I really don't harbor any bad feelings. I think Joe Morin from Storybids did an amazing job putting all of this together. In the video, I don't give him nearly the credit he deserves. Very frankly - there never would have been any media, any sponsor or any chance of succeeding without Joe's brilliant work. I'm eternally grateful and he knows it. I'm not upset with the sponsor, either, although I hope one day they can find the courage to let me show the video we made to my fiancée - I think they're very paranoid about it getting leaked onto the web, but it would be great fun to let her see it.

As for the aftermath - we had raised about $10,000 through MySuperProposal.com in donations, and that money was given away to the Vanderbilt Children's Hospital. The very kind folks from the Veronica Mars show not only called us on the night of the proposal (as they had heard about it), they sent flowers and a signed copy of the script. An article ran the next morning in the local paper, but despite a short media blitz, there was no big circus, and I think that's just how we both preferred it. For those cynics who worried that we'd never set a date, we have - the wedding will be in the middle of September of this year, so expect my blogging to be non-existent at the end of the summer :)

A few relevant links:

Enjoy the SuperBowl, everyone - maybe there will even be some great commercials on this year. I'll let you know if we end up on the Oprah show for Valentine's Day...

Do you like this post? Yes No

source

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

Yahoo Board, Sans Semel, to Consider Microsoft Bid

Yahoo's board of directors has issued a statement saying it will evaluate Microsoft's unsolicited bid to acquire Yahoo for $44.6 billion. Not surprisingly, the board will be doing so without the input of former CEO and chairman Terry Semel, who stepped down as chairman last night. He was replaced as CEO by founder Jerry Yang back in June, and has been busy staffing up his old Windsor Media venture, though it remains to be seen what form that former investment firm will take. Roy Bostock, who has sat on Yahoo's board since May 2003, was elected to serve as non-executive chairman.

Semel's departure may bode well for a potential Microsoft deal, since he's been vocal in his disdain for such a merger. It also won't hurt that Yahoo's been shedding executives for the past year, so at least some of the potential redundancies are already dealt with.

On a conference call this morning to discuss the acquisition, Kevin Johnson, president of Microsoft's Platforms and Services Division, suggested that Microsoft's offer would be the only one Yahoo could get, given anti-trust concerns that would prevent Google from making an offer. he played on the underdog theme, saying, "The fact is the industry will be better served by having a more credible alternative" in search and advertising.

source

Vote for the SMX West Search Bowl Competitors

Posted by randfish

First off, a quick apology. I had posted this on Monday night without first checking with our nominees to ensure they could attend. I've now done so and thus, have a list of potential competitors who will be present if called upon! Sadly, favorites like Dave Naylor, Aaron Wall and a few others will not be in attendance, but the vast majority of nominees are attending!

For those who may be confused,  next month at the inaugural SMX West search marketing conference, two intrepid search marketers will take on teams from Google, Yahoo!, MSN/Live & Ask.com in the first ever Search Bowl! Search Bowl is a trivia game, wherein the teams of two will be asked questions related to search and search marketing and those with the greatest knowledge of all things "search" will take home eternal glory! Or, at least, a 1994 Chrysler LeBaron (that's the prize, right Danny?).

For this voting, I've asked each of our nominees to prepare a short statement indicating why they would be best qualified to represent search marketers on the trivia field of battle. Here are their responses:

Heather Lloyd Martin (of SuccessWorks):

Sure, Why Not. Sounds like fun! :)

Michael Gray (of Wolf-Howl):

The man who bought a text link from Matt Cutts.

Hamlet Batista (of HamletBatista.com)

Kowing and doing what everybody else does is not a competitive advantage.

Andy Beal (of Marketing Pilgrim):

I've probably read 100,000+ search industry news items over the past five years, if I don't release the pressure by regurgitating them, my head will explode.

Ian Lurie (of Portent Interactive):

Er, what is a Search Bowl? Should I wear protective clothing?

Todd Friesen (Oilman and now part of Visible Technologies - congrats, Todd, and welcome to Seattle):

I'll bring my cup....

Greg Boser (of WebGuerrilla):

I am coming, but I'm really hoping I don't win.

Matt McGee (of SmallBusinessSEM):

Every vote for me is an entry in next year's SEMMY Awards! (Not really, sorry.)

Loren Baker (of SearchEngineJournal):

I (nominate) Bill (Slawski) just as long as we can limit his answers to under 60 seconds and insist that he wear an eye patch :)

Andrew Goodman (of Traffick):

I feel that I'll fare better if we add an egg race, real Super Bowl trivia, or "best impression of Bugs Bunny" to the mix, but anyway, count me as "game" to be humiliated in some shape or form.

Jill Whalen (of HighRankings):

 I'm the one who made Altavista rank first for "search engine" at Google. Why? Because I can.

Congrats to all our nominees. Now please help your industry select its finest for the battle ahead:

 

 

Thanks for voting - we'll announce a winner next week (along with some other very cool stuff about SEOmoz's participation in SMX West).

p.s. That's not actually Jill's quote. I just made it up because she didn't get back to me with the requested one-liner. I'm sure if she had, it would be something far more clever and vote inducing.


Do you like this post? Yes No

source

Monday, February 4, 2008

Rewriting the Beginner's Guide to SEO: Rewriting, Server & Hosting Issues

Posted by randfish

I'm currently in the process of re-authoring and re-building the Beginner's Guide to Search Engine Optimization, section by section. You can read more about this project here.


Redirecting Pages for Users & Search Engines

On the web, as in life, the only constant rule is that nothing is constant and all things must change. However, on the web, when things need to change, or, in our case, move, specifically from one URL to another, there are critical best practices to observe.

Let's first assume that you have a simple scenario - a URL that needs to re-point to another address permanently.

Illustration of a Redirect

There are multiple options for accomplishing this feat, but in general, a single one, the 301-redirect, is preferrable for both users and search engines. Serving a 301 indicates to both browsers and bots that the page has moved permanently. Search engines interpret this to mean that not only has the page changed location, but that the content, or an updated version of it, can be found at the new URL. The engines will carry any link weighting from the original page to the new URL, as below:

Googlebot successfully follows a 301 Re-direct

Be aware that when moving a page from one URL to another, the search engines will take some time to discover the 301, recognize it and credit the new page with the rankings and weight of its predecessor. This process can be lengthier if your page hasn't changed in a long time and the spiders rarely visit it, or if the new URL doesn't properly resolve.

Other options for redirection, like 302s (temporary redirects), meta refreshes, or Javascript are poor substitues, as they generally will not pass the rankings and search engine value like the 301.

Transferring content becomes more complex when an entire site changes its domain or when content moves from one domain to another. Due to abuse by spammers and suspicion by the search engines, 301s between domains sometimes require more time to be properly spidered and counted. For more on moving sites, see Expectations and Best Practices for Moving to or Launching a New Domain.

Server & Hosting Issues

There are thankfully few server or web hosting dilemmas that affect the practice of search engine optimization. However, when overlooked, they can spiral into massive problems, and so are worthy of our review. The following are server and hosting issues that can negatively impact search engine rankings:

  • Server Timeouts - If a search engine makes a page request that isn't served within the bot's time limit (or that produces a server timeout response), your pages may not make it into the index at all, and will almost certainly rank very poorly (as no indexable text content has been found).
  • Slow Response Times - Although this is not as damaging as server timeouts, above, it still presents a potential issue. Not only will crawlers be less likely to wait for your pages to load, but surfers and potential linkers may choose to visit and link-to other resources because accessing your site becomes a problem.
  • Shared IP Addresses - Lisa Barone wrote an excellent post on the topic of shared IP Adresses back in March of 2007. Basic concerns include speed, the potential for having spammy or untrusted neighbors sharing your IP address and potential concerns about receiving the full benefit of links to your IP address (discussed in more detail here).
  • Blocked IP Addresses - As search engines crawl the web, they frequently find entire blocks of IP addresses filled with nothing but egregious web spam. Rather than blocking each individual site, engines do occassionally take the added measure of blocking an IP address or even an IP range. If you're concerned, search for your IP address at MSN/Live using the IP:address query (or SEOmoz's Who Else is Hosted on My IP Tool).
  • Bot Detection and Handling - Some SysAdmins will go a bit overboard with protection and restrict access to files to any single visitor making over a certain number of requests in a given timeframe. This can be disastrous for search engine traffic, as it will constantly limit the crawling ability of the spiders.
  • Bandwidth & Transfer Limitations - Many servers have set limitations on the amount of traffic that can run through to the site. This can be potentially disastrous when content on your site becomes very popular and your host shuts off access. Not only are potential linkers prevented from seeing (and thus, linking to) your work, but search engines are also cut off from spidering.
  • Server Geography - This isn't necessarily a problem, but it is good to be aware that search engines do use the location of the web server when determining where a site's content is relevant to from a local search perspective. Since local search is a major part of many sites' campaigns and it is estimated that close to 40% of all queries have some local search intent, it's very wise to host in the country (it's not neccessary to get more granular) where your content is most relevant.

I'm actually really excited to have this section finished, as it means I can start diving into some less dry, more fun material with the next few chapters :)

BTW - If you haven't yet taken our survey, please do! And yes, expect to see me post this at the bottom of every blog post for the next few days to help encourage participation. We're hoping to get 3,000 or more responses, which would dwarf the sample size of something like the SEMPO report (which garnered 587 responses for 2006).


Do you like this post? Yes No

source

CrazyEgg: New Free SEM/SEO Analytics Tool Blows My Mind

I'm constantly on the lookout for software tools and services that help us serve our clients better. Since I've been a closet geek and software junkie my entire life, I get a mild kick when I come across software that's well-designed and provides value and features that really stand out. Yesterday I was tipped off to one that almost literally knocked me out of my chair.

Click to read the rest of this post...

source

Sunday, February 3, 2008

Vote for the SMX West Search Bowl Contestants

Posted by randfish

Last week, we asked for your help in nominating candidates for SMX West's inaugural Search Bowl - a game of trivia that pits two intrepid search marketers against teams of two from each of the four major engines. Due to the writer's strike, there won't be a televised black tie, red carpet event. Instead, without further ado, here are the nominees:

 

 

Voting will run through to next Tuesday, when we'll announce the two winners. If any winners cannot make it, the selection will pass to the person with the next most votes.

BTW - Scott will be officially announcing it soon, but it's looking like SEOmoz will have a sponsored session on using premium membership at SMX West, open to all attendees (full conference and networking pass attendees). More to come!

p.s. Anyone notice that PollDaddy has gone to a freemium business model? Can I just say again how much I like that model :)


Do you like this post? Yes No

source